Capital Punishment and Assisted Suicide

On the other hand, Hillyard and Dombrink (2002) distinguish some(prenominal) disadvantages that have traditionally been associated with just to die policies. matchless of the just about important of these is that it could well involve a 'slippery slope' in which life story is devalued overall, so devalued that older community will be pressured to use the option against their will in direct that others whitethorn profit (e.g., directors of HMOs, relatives who get the benefits of their insurance policies, etc.). Further, numerous ethicists point out that quality of life can be much improved for some through palliative therapy and indeed a life of good quality can, for most, be kept up(p) almost until the end.

Leung (2007) nones that dying with dignity is part of the 'right to die" movement. Typically, the marches is used to refer to allowing the patient to die in order to spare him or her living solely on the caution of life can or living with a poorly diminished capacity. In other words, it is the idea of committing suicide beforehand any of this can occur and, as a result, macrocosm allowed to die with one's dignity maintained. The pivotal argument is that decisions about this should be primarily in the hands of the patient.

In a discourse of the legalities surrounding right to die issues (e.g., suicide, assisted suicide, refusal of treatment, etc.), the United

Durante, C. (2009). Life, liberty, and the pursuit of palliation: re-evaluating Ronald Lindsay's evaluation of the surgery Death with Dignity Act. American Journal of Bioethics, 9(3), 28-29.

One of the most comprehensive efforts to help with end of life decisions has been the Texas Advance directional Act of 1999.

According to Fine (2009), this act combined several existing provisions and now allows a health solicitude facility to discontinue life-sustaining treatment against the wishes of the patient or guardian ten days after giving scripted notice if the continuation of life-sustaining treatment is considered medically remote by the treating medical team. Patients can themselves reject treatment and so can their surrogates. In an evaluation of the outcomes of the Act, Fine reported that it two effectively and ethnically resolved several disputes and problems associated with end of life decisions and medical support.

The United States Supreme Court Center (2009) similarly reports that if there is reason to believe that family members are not performing in a patient's best interest, then the state may move against the expressed wishes of the family member in favor of sustaining life. It is remark that the Court in like manner ruled that refusal of all medical treatment, including hydration and nutrition, is allowed not only by terminally ill patients but also severely incapacitated patients who could, theoretically, live for years with medical support equipment. Thus, the legalities surround the right to die include rulings that support the right in specific instances.

Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.