The company theory that I discover myself least attracted to is...Weber's bureaucracy theory.
a. The essence of this theory as I realize it is...that organizations are governed according to power and control. Somebody is in charge, and that person has all the authority within the business like a whole or in a workgroup. That individual needs to be obeyed unequivocally, as need to all of the organization's rules.
b. The aspects in my background and aspects of my personality that I feel lead me being predisposed away from this theory are...my jobs experiences in bureaucratic companies and my penchant for individualism. The bureaucratic organizations I have worked in-particularly the government-have been slow and cumbersome organizations exactly where it was incredibly difficult to effect change. Thus, those people organizations had been usually behind the times in terms of strategy and technology. I consider bureaucracy stifles creativity and innovation and often leans to tradition rather than definitely considering via what may jobs most effective inside a particular situation. It is rules-bound and thus unresponsive on the distinct desires of the scenario. My independent considering makes me the wrong person for a bureaucratic organization. People who appreciate being guided in everything and told what to do make better bureaucratic employees. They are not risk takers and do not need to take responsibility for outcomes, only for their a dherence towards code. I, on the other hand, appreciate creating, problem solving, and innovating, all activities which are practically impossible in a bureaucratic organization. I am also a really competitive person, and I find bureaucratic organizations tedious to work in since they're as well constrained being competitive. They always arrive in last behind the corporations that permit creativity including a constant influx of talent and information.
What would these kinds of a person have a tendency to project into or onto organizational situations? Being a bureaucracy opponent, I would be inclined to project excessive bureaucratic control onto organizational situations, even if others may well not consider the exact same way. Furthermore, I may perhaps don't see the creative opportunities inside a bureaucratic situation simply because I would already be convinced that they do not exist.
What would be probably the most characteristic errors in organizational analysis and action that somebody holding my preference theory would make? What would this kind of somebody will not see in organizational situations? Folks with my theory preferences would characteristically make errors of overlooking the value of bureaucracy as a result of a prejudice against it and an more than reliance on culture to resolve all issues. Even though bureaucracy is largely negative, it does have some certain attributes, just like order; creative corporations can also be somewhat chaotic.
No comments:
Post a Comment